Weekly Update February 22-27, 2026

Fun with Grok!

Rural Renewal or Ruin: A Firm Call to Action from Rep. Kent Roe's Weekly Update and District 4's School Struggles

By Rep. Kent Roe, South Dakota House of Representatives, District 4 February 27, 2026

Friends and Neighbors in District 4, Let's confront the realities of governance with unflinching resolve, because ignoring them won't make them go away. This week in Pierre, Crossover Day on February 24 put our commitment to truth and responsibility to the test, as bills either crossed chambers or faded into oblivion. We have no choice but to advance measures that fortify our communities through disciplined scrutiny, voting not for short-term expedience but for principles that sustain our rural way of life: agriculture, family values, and fiscal prudence. But let's be clear: these foundational values are at risk of erosion if we stubbornly fail to expand opportunities for our youth. Otherwise, we keep sending our best and brightest across state lines, succumbing to a brain drain that hollows out our future and leaves our towns echoing with the footsteps of the departed.

Economic opportunities aren't the enemy of our rural ethos, they're the lifeline. Far from threatening it, they deliver profound results by keeping families intact, curbing the emigration of young people desperate for jobs and stability, and tempering the influx of senior citizens who, after all, do not bear children to replenish our communities. Our reliance on agriculture and tourism is sound and honorable, but adding industry, whether tech, manufacturing, or some other sector, could temper our out-migration trends and potentially reverse these persistent declines. Make no mistake: chasing away everything that is not homogeneous, be it innovative industries, diverse talents, or fresh ideas, is not just foolish policy, it's a self-defeating stance that accelerates economic stagnation and the very brain drain that leaves our rural heartland barren and vulnerable. We can't afford to cling to sameness while our communities shrink; it's time to face facts and fight for growth with the same grit that built this district.

Look no further than the stark demographic trends in our counties, Clark, Codington, Deuel, Grant, Hamlin, and Roberts, for proof. Populations here show a mixed picture: Codington is up about 3.4% since 2020, Hamlin about 7%, driven by agricultural strength and some in-migration. But overall rural decline persists, with net out-migration of youth aged 18-25 (e.g., -2% in Clark, -1.1% in Codington, -1.6% in Deuel in recent counts), leading to an aging populace where median ages hover around 40-45, higher than urban averages. This isn't just numbers, it's a crisis. Under-18 populations are declining in absolute terms across most counties, while the 65+ group grows fastest (up 3-5% since 2010 in many areas), tilting spending toward healthcare over family needs and stifling vitality. Rural households allocate more to essentials like groceries (South Dakotans spend around $256 weekly, below the national $270) amid 5% annual consumer growth, but an older demographic means less investment in youth-oriented purchases. Church attendance, a pillar of our values, has waned 10-15% over the decade, mirroring statewide Lutheran and Catholic declines (e.g., 14% drop for Lutherans since 2013), as depopulation scatters congregations and erodes communal bonds. Birth frequencies remain robust, South Dakota leads the nation at 65.6 per 1,000 women aged 15-44, but rural rates in District 4 dip 3-5% since 2020, underscoring how fewer young families threaten generational renewal.

This demographic squeeze directly hammers our schools, a cornerstone of community life. Enrollment drops of 2-5% in recent years have prompted consolidations and reduced funding, forcing painful decisions that no rural legislator relishes. By amplifying our strong value base through targeted economic growth, affordable housing, job creation in ag-tech and tourism, we can supplement and uphold these principles, ensuring our young people build lives here, rooted in responsibility and community, rather than fleeing elsewhere. Good governance isn't free or cheap; it exacts a toll in vigilance and sacrifice. We must put people at the center, pro-actively pursuing reforms that reverse these trends, or watch our district fade.

To illustrate the urgency, consider the historical consolidations across District 4's counties, overlaid with these demographics. These aren't abstract events; they're the direct result of long-term drivers like farm mechanization and urban job pulls, compounded by primary triggers like sub-100 enrollments mandating state intervention. We've lost schools, but we can regain ground by embracing change firmly and without apology.

Clark County: Population down ~52% since 1950 (from 8,369 to est. 4,032 in 2026), with under-18 stable at 27.6% but absolute declines from low births; 65+ up ~5% since 2010, fastest growing. Districts: Clark 12-2 (~300 students), Willow Lake 12-3 (~200). Pre-1950s one-room absorptions amid depopulation; 1950s–1960s closures like Southeast Merton (1962) due to youth drops; 1977 Bradley closure into Clark from unsustainable numbers post-22.7% drop (1960–1970). No recent changes, but aging risks mergers.

Codington County: Grown ~54% since 1950 (to est. 29,930 in 2026), but rural aging with under-18 down to 23.4%; 65+ up 3–4%. Districts: Watertown 14-4 (~3,800), Waverly-South Shore 14-5 (~200), Florence 14-1 (~150), Henry 14-2 (~100). 1950s–1960s rural closures; 2009 South Shore dissolution into Waverly-South Shore due to <100 enrollment and >50% open-enrolling amid rural 65+ rise. Growth buffers urban areas, but rural pressures persist.

Deuel County: Halved since 1950 (to est. 4,315 in 2026), under-18 declining; 65+ fastest growing at 21.6%. District: Deuel 19-4 (~300). 1960 Brandt closure amid -11.8% drop (1950–1960); 1977 Brandt High refinement; 1989 Gary/Clear Lake to Deuel for efficiency; 2017 Grant-Deuel dissolution (portion to Deuel) from <100 enrollment. Stable now, but 65+ growth threatens.

Grant County: Declined until stabilization (to est. 7,712 in 2026), under-18 declining; 65+ at 23.7% fastest. District: Milbank 25-4 (~900). 1968 Strandburg closure amid -9.2% drop (1960–1970); 1990 Big Stone City 25-2 dissolution (elementary refinement pre-closure); 2017 Grant-Deuel majority to Milbank from <100; 2025 Big Stone City 25-1 closure/dissolution from <100 and open-enrolling. 65+ rise increases strain.

Hamlin County: Declined early, grown since 1990 (to est. 6,750 in 2026), under-18 higher at 32.3%; 65+ growing slower. Districts: Hamlin 28-3 (~881), Castlewood 28-1 (~338), Estelline 28-2 (~275). 1950s–1960s rural closures; 1972 Hamlin formation (Bryant/Hazel/Lake Norden closures) amid -17.9% drop (1960–1970); 1978 division rejected; 1990s Lake Norden gym demolition; 2003 Hayti High condemnation for safety. Recent 7.4% growth (2010–2022) stabilizes, but early declines drove centralization.

Roberts County: Down ~31% since 1950 (to est. 10,195 in 2026), under-18 declining; 65+ at 21.2% fastest. Districts: Sisseton 54-2 (~900), Wilmot 54-7 (~200), Rosholt 54-4 (~150), Summit 54-6 (~100). 1950s–1970s one-room closures; 1966 Peever to Sisseton amid -11.7% drop (1950–1960); 1986 Corona dissolution (elementary refinement); 1990 Sisseton/New Effington reorganization; 1993–1994 Browns Valley to Sisseton; 2004 Veblen to Sisseton. Stable, but 65+ growth heightens risks.

These school histories aren't relics, they're warnings. My yea votes this week reflected a firm ethos: supporting bills that protect our heritage while rejecting undue burdens, always with an eye toward amplifying our values through targeted growth. SCR 607, which I prime-sponsored, advanced February 25 (57-8), calling for federal aid in rural water projects essential to our agricultural integrity, my yea vote underscored the necessity of infrastructure for our farms and families. HB 1041 progressed for military renovations at the Sturgis Readiness Center; I cast a yea on February 23 in support of our veterans and national defense. On February 26, the House concurred in SCR 602 (66-0), recognizing rural development efforts, I voted yea to affirm our state's commitment to balanced growth. These advancements remind us that progress requires vigilance against overreach.

On the floor, I voted yea on SB 231 for water infrastructure funding February 26 (66-0), ensuring reliable resources for our 4,551-square-mile district's irrigation and community needs. However, SB 211 failed February 24 (24-42); while I supported regulatory reform aspects, my nay vote reflected concerns over potential environmental laxity. In Transportation Committee on February 23, we advanced HB 1034 to increase mailing fees for vehicle decals (10-2 do pass); my yea vote prioritized efficient state operations without raising core taxes.

My sponsored legislation pushes forward: HB 1299, enabling biological pool filtration for rural lodges, passed the House February 22 (52-14) to boost tourism, I voted yea as sponsor, emphasizing sustainable options for small businesses. HB 1311, demanding transparency in foreign university funding, passed committee February 25 (9-3 do pass in Taxation) and awaits Senate hearings; my yea championed accountability to protect our institutions. HB 1201, empowering booster clubs with fundraising tools like bingo and lotteries, was signed February 26 after House passage, I voted yea on the floor reaffirmation February 24, nurturing youth and education. These bills uphold stewardship over indulgence, reflecting my priorities for District 4's rural vitality.

My advocacy extended to co-sponsored measures: On February 27, I voted yea on HB 1062 revisions for assault provisions (62-5), aiming for just legal frameworks.

In property tax and economic discussions, we debated HB 1308 in Taxation Committee, proposing a sales tax hike to 5% to eliminate school property taxes on owner-occupied homes. It passed committee 10-2 February 17, a step toward relief, and I voted yea to explore homeowner protections. But it failed on the floor twice: first an amendment to cut food sales tax to zero, then the bill itself 24-42 February 24. I voted yea on both, advocating balanced sacrifice without regressive shifts that harm low-income families, this highlights the hard truth that reform demands precision, not broad strokes.

I advocated strongly for HB 1113, establishing zero-interest downpayment assistance for manufactured housing up to $10,000 to address affordability and foster self-reliance. In committee February 23 (8-4 do pass), I voted yea, pushing for accessible homeownership. Despite support, it fell short twice on the floor February 24 (45-21), I voted yea both times, a setback in confronting our housing crisis, but a call to refine future efforts.

SB 239 on data centers failed February 25 (32-35), prioritizing citizen protections; I voted nay, as it risked unchecked expansion. My HB 1005 for targeted tax exemptions didn't advance earlier, but refinements continue for prudent growth that brings jobs without eroding our tax base. On February 27, I voted yea on SB 180 amendments in joint session (13-4), supporting appropriations for economic development tied to accountability.

Ahead, we'll shift to budget scrutiny for roads, schools, and healthcare in our expansive district. South Dakota's economy remains strong, but we must spend wisely to keep taxes low and support essentials. The session's endgame demands even greater resolve to deliver for you.

If you have thoughts or need help, reach out: Kent.Roe@sdlegislature.gov or (605) 520-4710. Follow at sdlegislature.gov.

Pursue truth with courage, because complacency is the real threat. Let's keep South Dakota moving forward, firmly and without apology.

Best regards,

Rep. Kent Roe

South Dakota House of Representatives, District 4